Look, Qualcomm, just with the purchase of Nuvia, is approaching a similar Monocore performance with its latest family for laptops.Its a funny thing when people compare Apple's IPC to AMD and Intel, yes its better in certain aspects, but at the same time it doesn't matter, the only way to take advantage of it is to buy a mac. So there's nothing easy about it, otherwise ARM with its X4 family of processors would be in the fight. Gfg said:Apple Processors have better IPC than AMD and Intel and also better overall single-thread performance, the M3 line at 4.05 Ghz demonstrates this. Look, Qualcomm, just with the purchase of Nuvia, is approaching a similar Monocore performance with its latest family for laptops. Here's a mnemonic: "son of loong".Apple Processors have better IPC than AMD and Intel and also better overall single-thread performance, the M3 line at 4.05 Ghz demonstrates this. When I first heard the name, I kept wanting to write "longsoon", which is a funny name to me, but only the first "o" is the one that's doubled up. Either that, or find someone in a neutral country to test it for you.īTW, it's misspelled, in the article's title. It'd probably be worth some research, to be sure you're not breaking any US laws. However, given they're on the entities list, it might not be as simple as ordering from Ali Express. I look forward to independent Loongson benchmarks. That's one reason Apple typically leads on IPC - their CPUs simply don't clock as high. Here's a mnemonic: "son of loong".īit_user said:Not to totally downplay this achievement, but it's not super hard to get good IPC at lower clockspeeds. It would be fun to get a Loongson 3A6000 CPU in the lab, with a suitable motherboard.I look forward to independent Loongson benchmarks. They were retired for good reasons, as they no longer characterize modern workloads nor stress all aspects of a CPU the way more recent benchmarks do. That's one reason Apple typically leads on IPC - their CPUs simply don't clock as high.īTW, SPEC CPU 2006 and UnixBench are obsolete benchmarks. Not to totally downplay this achievement, but it's not super hard to get good IPC at lower clockspeeds. But IPC is only half the equation, and Intel's modern chips can clock about twice as high. Moreover, even Intel’s Core i5-14600K wasn’t significantly superior in SPEC CPU 2006, when restrained to 2.5 GHz. This isn’t a trivial achievement, if Loongson is indeed achieving this with its own core IP and Dragon architecture, as it claims. Pre-launch we saw it was roughly on par with the Intel Core i3-10100 in SPEC CPU 2006 and UnixBench (at iso-clocks). Regular readers probably won’t be too impressed at the performance of the out-of-the-box and overclocked Loongson 3A6000. According to the linked ITHome report, 3.0 GHz isn’t going to be an impenetrable barrier for the 3A6000, and it says it thinks things will improve in the future and indicates that 3.0 GHz is a limit currently set in the Asus motherboard BIOS. However, Uncle Tony pushed things further for fun, using liquid nitrogen to coax the CPU to 3.0 GHz. Apparently, the new Chinese CPU can be "easily" overclocked to 2.63 GHz on air. In his BiliBili video, he tested a sample on the new Asus XC-LS3A6M motherboard. Chinese TechTuber Uncle Tony took the Loongson 3A6000 desktop processor for a spin a few hours ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |